femkes_follies: (Default)
femkes_follies ([personal profile] femkes_follies) wrote2010-07-27 01:51 pm
Entry tags:

Brief SCA Survey

Comment, if you feel inclined, with a ball park figure of how many local groups your Kingdom has. If you're really feeling helpful, divide Baronies/Provinces from other types - but count each Canton as a Local Group, even though it belongs to a Barony.

I's curious.

[identity profile] femkederoas.livejournal.com 2010-07-27 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Question - do you feel the Large Region needs to divide into more Regions? Or that your Kingdom needs to spin out another Principality? Or both?

[identity profile] jillwheezul.livejournal.com 2010-07-27 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Not divide into further regions - the Central Region is about a 5-6 hour driving distance from one end to the other, pretty much.

It could split into 2 more Principalities, or the southern portion of the region could join the one already existing US Principality, leaving basically Washington State mostly to be one Principality (or not). The arguing point is who gets to keep the name of the Kingdom... Since Seattle and Portland can not agree who actually was the first group in the kingdom, there isn't a clear historical precendence to follow either.

It would seem to make sense for the Canadian Principalities to spin off and just become its own kingdom, but the word that travels around is that the residents of those 2 Principalities aren't ready/willing.

[identity profile] minyata.livejournal.com 2010-07-27 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Or able, since we have been told we need at least 600 members (even though Corpora states 400 to make up a Kingdom)

Speaking as a member of the remote Canadian Principality, we have little to no contact with our Kingdom unless we make to exerted effort to be.

[identity profile] femkederoas.livejournal.com 2010-07-30 06:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Now, was the Rivers Region that was trying to make a go of the Principality thing near you?

And do you know what happened with that?