(no subject)

Date: 2011-08-22 07:41 pm (UTC)
femkes_follies: (Default)
Thing is, the separate incorporation, if I understand correctly, is for tax purposes. I don't believe it will protect local assets from seizure in the event of a major judgement against the SCA, Inc. Otherwise, all corporations would just spin off other subsidiaries and transfer their assets in the event of a liability judgement.

(That is the suit I refer to, yes).

So, if you're considering having to try to put on events with no "nest egg" and no corporate liability insurance... now what?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2014

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios